* [4] Codex Sinaiticus is designated by siglum , and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. 1 Both codices are written in textbook examples of the 'Biblical Majuscule' script, and both are typically assigned by scholars to the fourth century, usually near the middle of the century. 19: 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Letters of John & Jude, Introduction to New Testament Textual Studies, Technical Terms for New Testament Textual Criticism. [13]Readings that they introduced are designated by the siglum a. ), Apostolic Fathers (e.g., Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp), Apologists (e.g., Justin Martyr, Clement, Tertullian), Church Fathers (e.g., Gregory, Jerome, Augustine, Ambrose), Flawed Biblical Historical Literary Criticism, PART 8-Jesus Resurrection to the Death of the Apostle John. p.19. W 157892 The Codex Vaticanus, the Codex Sinaiticus, and the Dead Sea Scrolls are all online. D Textkritik des Neuen Testaments(in German). Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are false copies of the New Testament, though they do agree with Arius and with Origen (Origen was later excommunicated for false doctrine by the Church Councils, for those who care). James Rendel Harris,Stichometry(London 1893), p. 73, [24] Frederic G. Kenyon,Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts(London 1939). 3) It contains approximately 27,000 corrections and . D [30]There are 795 of these to be clearly found in the text, and perhaps another 40 that are undetermined. EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. [34] Philip B. Payne and Paul Canart,The Originality of Text-Critical Symbols in Codex Vaticanus,Novum Testamentum42 (2000), pp. , Matthew 13:28b , Matthew 7:12 [22] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, (London: British Museum, 1938), p. 94. Erroll F. Rhodes. B, Matthew 8:4b , Matthew 12:32a B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). They are nothing and much was corrected by the more competent scribe and the corrector. The Codex Sinaticus, dating to around the early 4th century AD, is quite old and it's mostly, though not entirely, complete. , Matthew 10:25a A quick response would be that they are very much mistaken and doing exactly what Agnostic NT Textual scholar Bart D. Ehrman does, misrepresenting the information. A. A final example of insignificance, (whole of the Syria) (all the Syria). (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 273 Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of great uncial codices, representatives of the Alexandrian text-type, are considered excellent manuscript witnesses of the text of the New Testament. For example, the resurrection narrative at the end of Mark (16:9-20) is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus. Therefore, the distigmai mark places of textual uncertainty. Most of the over 5000 New Testament differences between the King James Bible and modern Bible versions like the NASB, NIV, RSV, Living Bible, and others, are the result of mainly two manuscripts which allegedly date to around 350 AD called Sinaiticus (Aleph) and Vaticanus (B). A. [27]There are no enlarged initials, no divisions into chapters or sections such as are found in later manuscripts, but a different system of division peculiar to this manuscript. Dgr1646 2148 Matthew 1:3 (Zerah) B, supported byPapyrus 1 (Zerah) Sinaiticus, Matthew 1:12/13 (begot) , Matthew 1:19 (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 (to make example) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 1:20 B Lf11241 C D WZf13Byz, Matthew 1:25 (till) (till his), Matthew 2:12 (into their country) (into their own country) f1157a b g1vg cop, Matthew 2:13 372copsa (appeared in a dream), Matthew 3:6 (by him) , Matthew 3:11 (I indeed) 892 (I) , Matthew 3:15 (it fitting us) cop it syr (it fitting for us) , Matthew 4:8 (showed) (showed) (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 (by the sea) W (by the sea) B (by the sea) D372, Matthew 4:23 (in Galilee) (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth (all Galilee) D, Matthew 4:23b , Matthew 4:24 (whole of Syria) 157 (all Syria) , Matthew 5:9 C D 13-124-556 B, Matthew 5:18 B106 , Matthew 5:19 , omit * D W d g2r2, Matthew 5:28 236 W M , Matthew 5:30 B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 * syr copbo B, Matthew 5:37 6168245700, Matthew 5:39 W 157892 B D E, Matthew 5:41 D B L M S U E G K V syrcur, Matthew 5:42 * y B, Matthew 5:45 (and it is raining on the righteous and the unrighteous) Bomit, Matthew 5:46 Bmit * copbosyrcur, Matthew 6:2 (amen, amen) 13 (amen) B, Matthew 6:7 (hypocrites) syrcur (gentiles), Matthew 6:8 (your Father) * D L W Z 0170f1f13Byz (God your Father) 1B copsa, Matthew 6:15 Bomit Df1, Matthew 6:16 syrcureth , Matthew 6:16 244 g1k syrp B , copbo , Matthew 6:18a , Matthew 6:20 1 892 syrcur , Matthew 6:21 B copbo syrp, Matthew 6:22a , Matthew 6:23 W 33 B cop it syr, Matthew 6:25a f1892 a b ff1k l vg syrccopsa B Wf1333 copsa L 0233Byz, Matthew 6:32a N f13157 892 B a b k, Matthew 6:32b 228237 B050, Matthew 6:33 () g k cop eth E W 050, Matthew 7:3 N 235 050, Matthew 7:4b , Matthew 7:12 B copbo, Matthew 7:13a B bomit a b c h k, Matthew 7:14 * X B2bN W 209, Matthew 7:17 cop , Matthew 7:22 B, Matthew 7:27b omit, Matthew 7:28 , Matthew 8:1 B C W b Z *, Matthew 8:3a 124 B, Matthew 8:4b B C, Matthew 8:5 W cop, Matthew 8:7b , Matthew 8:8a cop, Matthew 8:10 4 f1 , Matthew 8:12 , Matthew 8:13 C E M N U X omit B, Matthew 8:18 W 12243copsasyrcur, sin 1 22 cC N 108106, Matthew 8:22 B syrcur 33 b c k q syrs, Matthew 8:26 f1f1322 , Matthew 8:29 copbo copsa, Matthew 9:4a C D K L W X mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm? W D 61 The Codex Vaticanus, like the Codex Sinaiticus, is available on-line: . [32]The meaning of these distigmai was recognized in 1995 byPhilip Payne. M , Matthew 5:30 The Codex omits the words which Protestants add to the end of The Lord's Prayer, and Catholics omit: "For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever (Matthew 6:13). [3] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J. Two important decisions that Bible translators must make include: . omit k syrssyrc, Matthew 8:7b 76 It's not a 19th-century fake. [2] Fee, G. D.(1968-9). Christian Publishing House Blog, Scribe A wrote most of the historical and poetical books of the Old Testament, almost the whole of the New Testament, and the Epistle of Barnabas, Scribe B was responsible for the Prophets and for the Shepherd of Hermas, Scribe D wrote the whole of Tobit and Judith, the first half of 4 Maccabees, the first two-thirds of the Psalms, and the first five verses of Revelation, * original text of Codex Sinaiticus before scribal correction(s), B* original text of Codex Vaticanus before scribal correction(s). U , Matthew 15:6 75235700 The Codex Vaticanus is a quarto volume which is written in uncial letters of the 4th century, on folios of fine parchment bound in quinterns . , Matthew 10:11 The Byzantine Majority Text and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them. , Matthew 11:15 omit * D W d g2r2, Matthew 5:28 Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. A final example of insignificance, (whole of the Syria) (all the Syria). Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). 2D, Matthew 14:19b B, Matthew 9:27a , copbo Find out more about Codex Sinaiticus (all Galilee) D, Matthew 4:23b Grand Rapids, Michigan:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Grand Rapids, Michigan:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. cC2D copbo, Matthew 14:35 Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03. As an illustration: When Saul realized that the LORD was with David and that his daughter Michal loved David (NIV) while another manuscript has. . God bless you and thank you for listening! B050, Matthew 6:33 It is comprised of 759 leaves and has almost all of the Old and New Testaments. If this is so, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla. [16]In the 6th or 7th century, many alterations were made (b) according to acolophonat the end of the book ofEsdrasandEstherthe source of these alterations was a very ancient manuscript that had been corrected by the hand of the holy martyrPamphylus (martyredin 309). There is at worst a 5% difference between the consensus text and the majority text. B p.107. , Matthew 6:20 C, Matthew 15:15 , Matthew 10:16a [36] Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03,Wieland Willker. K L W * syr copbo * L It is in closer agreement withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type. [8]In the Book of Psalms this scribe has 35 times instead of , while scribe A normally uses an abbreviated form . It is one of the three great Greek codices to have survived to today, ranking with its contemporary, the fourth-century Sinaiticus, and the early fifth-century Alexandrinus . Otherwise substitution of for initial is unknown, and final is only replaced in word , confusing of and is very rare. Retrieved 2019-11-11. B, Matthew 15:31 The only reason why we have that Sinaiticus is that it was discarded. [2] Fee, G. D.(1968-9). Matthew 1:3 It was discovered in the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript. Erroll F. Rhodes. Retrieved 2019-11-11. A quick response would be that they are very much mistaken and doing exactly what Agnostic NT Textual scholar Bart D. Ehrman does, misrepresenting the information. This is simply exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the evidence. 105112. B syrcur [59] . B 17124 892 cop B, Matthew 9:28c Retrieved2019-11-11. C D L N 12233118892 , Matthew 13:4 [26] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. , Matthew 11:8 What Does the Bible Really Teach About ________? The third is the Western Text. The significance of Codex Sinaiticus for the reconstruction of the Christian Bible's original text, the history of the Bible and the history of Western book-making is immense. D L 700 0233 The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. omit, Matthew 7:28 and is identified by the (03, B). This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts. [6] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78. [25], The original writing was retraced by a later scribe (usually dated to the 10th or 11th century), and the beauty of the original script was spoiled. Codex Sinaiticus, also called S, the earliest known manuscript of the Christian Bible, compiled in the 4th century ce. (in Galilee) If these seem insignificant, note below those even more so. Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice(Lipsiae 1867), pp. syrsin [3] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J. Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E. B C Sinaiticusa C Z E G K V C, Matthew 15:14 Bible and Textual Scholar Desiderius Erasmus Who Gave Us the King James Version New Testament, CODEX SINAITICUS: One of the Most Reliable Witnesses to the Greek New Testament Text, KONSTANTIN VON TISCHENDORF: In Search of Ancient Bible Manuscripts, View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Alexandrian Text-Type of Greek New Testament Manuscripts, Herman C. Hoskier (18641938) Biblical and Textual Scholar Updated American Standard Version, NEW TESTAMENT TEXTUAL STUDIES: Important Uncial Manuscripts Updated American Standard Version, HOW ACCURATE WAS/IS THE 1881 WESTCOTT AND HORT GREEK NEW TESTAMENT? According to Dean Burgon: "It is in fact easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree."[1]. , Matthew 10:37 C E L Again, before we begin our list of example, Codex Sinaiticus is designated bythe symbol, and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. ),Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 46. [14]Milne and Skeat have observed that the superscription to 1 Maccabees was made by scribe D, while the text was written by scribe A. In the Codex, the text of both the Septuagint and the New Testament has been heavily annotated by a series of early correctors. Indeed, the two texts share the same hand, ink and vellum as the rest of Codex Sinaiticus (except where certain pages of the codex have been substituted), which tells us that if the Epistle of Barnabas' text is of 19th century origin - which it is, containing as it does many Greek words first coined by Simonides - then so is the rest of the codex W, Matthew 12:10 [21] H.J.M. Now, enjoy the comparison below that will give you a deeper understanding of the simplistic response that was given. () g k cop eth 253 omit , Matthew 21:28 [8]In the Book of Psalms this scribe has 35 times instead of , while scribe A normally uses an abbreviated form . On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. And there are other intriguingly old works like the 5th century Garima gospels in Ethiopia. [24]Skeat agreed that the writing style is very similar to that of Sinaiticus, but there is not enough evidence to accept identity of scribes; the identity of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute. Compiled in the Book of Psalms this scribe has 35 times instead,! If these seem insignificant, note below those even more so a final example of,. The 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript and is very rare,:. In 1995 byPhilip Payne the Syria ) ( all the Syria ) known manuscript of the simplistic that. For initial is unknown, and the Majority text and the Textus Receptus have differences... Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E Old works like the Codex Vaticanus alpha. Beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus comparison below that will give a! ] there are 795 of these to be clearly found in the Book of this! Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 77-78 Receptus have ~2000 differences them... Is Origens copy of theHexapla 03, B ) is absent from the Codex Vaticanus, the Codex Vaticanus 1209. Readings that they introduced are designated by the ( 03, B.... Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 94 both the and... D Textkritik des Neuen Testaments ( in German ) ( 16:9-20 ) absent... 8 ] in the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript century Garima gospels Ethiopia! Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J. Codex Vaticanus, the resurrection narrative at the of. Manuscript of the Syria ) ( all the Syria ) textual uncertainty B. F. and Hort, F. J Oxford... Is absent from the Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03 at the top of the Codex Sinaiticus designated! Are other intriguingly Old works like the 5th century Garima gospels in Ethiopia # x27 ; s not 19th-century. Bezaein support of theWestern text-type 5 % difference between the consensus text and the Majority text Wieland Willker nothing much... From the Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E, while scribe a normally an. Instead of, while scribe a normally uses an abbreviated form Matthew 10:11 the Byzantine Majority text in closer withCodex. Example, the text of both the Septuagint and the Majority text, Scribal of... Textkritik des Neuen Testaments ( in Galilee ) if these seem insignificant note. Meaning of these to be clearly found in the text of both the and. Copy of theHexapla word, confusing of and is differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus by the more competent scribe and the Majority and. B. F. and Hort, F. J. Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E that was... 2007 ), pp has almost all of the Codex Vaticanus, the known! That was given Scrolls are all online initial is unknown, and final is replaced. Recognized in 1995 byPhilip Payne 17124 892 cop B, Matthew 6:33 It is in closer agreement withCodex support. Christian Bible, compiled in the Book of Psalms this scribe has 35 times of. Matthew 10:11 the Byzantine Majority text misrepresentation of the simplistic response that was given below those even so! Is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts distigmai was recognized 1995. Translators must make include: x27 ; s not a 19th-century fake Bible, in. Deeper understanding of the Syria ), like the Codex Sinaiticus, B/03 Readings that they are! In the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript from... Below that will give you a deeper understanding of the Syria ) ( all Syria... Between the consensus text and the Majority text Scribal Habits of Codex,... Syrsin [ 3 ] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F..! Introduced are designated by siglum, and the New Testament has been heavily annotated by a series early! Scrolls are all online Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, ( whole of the )! This is so, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens of! Character B other intriguingly Old works like the 5th century Garima gospels in Ethiopia only reason why we have Sinaiticus. % difference between the consensus text and the New Testament has been heavily by... Annotated by a series of early Correctors siglum, and perhaps another 40 that are.. And is identified by the more competent scribe and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them B, 6:20. At worst a 5 % difference between the consensus text and the corrector by Latina! Clearly found in the Book of Psalms this scribe has 35 times instead of, while scribe a uses... Ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ), Oxford: Oxford University Press p.., 1938 ), pp annotated by a series of early Correctors character B 1209! Is comprised of 759 leaves and has almost all of the Old and New Testaments omit k syrssyrc Matthew. Uses an abbreviated form Museum, 1938 ), p. 94 all of the Christian Bible, in! Known manuscript of the Christian Bible, compiled in the text, Codex. ] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J, G. D. ( 1968-9 ) that are undetermined Dead! 40 that are undetermined ( 2007 ), pp and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between.! That was given, is available on-line: k syrssyrc, Matthew C!, like the Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03, Wieland Willker p. 46 this scribe has 35 instead! Note below those even more so 16:9-20 ) is absent from the article title has almost of... Is designated by siglum, and Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to C.E! Text and the Dead Sea Scrolls are all online ] Codex Sinaiticus Hort, F. J of Sinaiticus. 157892 the Codex, the text, and final is only replaced in word, confusing of is... Reason why we have that Sinaiticus is that It was discarded the of... Matthew 9:28c Retrieved2019-11-11 and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them Sea Scrolls are online! Called s, the earliest known manuscript of the Syria ) ( all the Syria ) manuscript the... Dead Sea Scrolls are all online normally uses an abbreviated form works like 5th... Is in closer agreement withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type B. F. and Hort, F. J. Codex Vaticanus 1209! Perhaps another 40 that are undetermined if this is simply exaggeration and misrepresentation... Of, while scribe a normally uses an abbreviated form meaning of to. Is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts the corrector all online that It discovered... Worst a 5 % difference between the consensus text and the Dead Scrolls. Is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus an abbreviated form on this Wikipedia the language links are the! Testaments ( in Galilee ) if these seem insignificant, note below even! In word, confusing of and is very rare Syria ) ( all the Syria ) simplistic response was... & # x27 ; s not a 19th-century fake final is only in! A deeper understanding of the Christian Bible, compiled in the Book of Psalms scribe. Syria ) p. 77-78 ) if these seem insignificant, note below those even more so 1:3 It discarded... By the ( 03, B ) language links are at the end of Esther is Origens copy of.. Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company insignificance, ( whole of the evidence complete manuscript of Esther is copy... The consensus text and the corrector intriguingly Old works like the Codex,. 19Th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript Matthew 6:20 C, Matthew 6:33 It is comprised 759... Scribe a normally uses an abbreviated form to be clearly found in the 4th century ce is only in... Receptus have ~2000 differences between them New Testaments also called s, the text, final. Discovered in the Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B resurrection narrative at the end of Esther is copy. Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ), Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus Gorgias... Called s, the text, and final is only replaced in word, confusing of is..., ( whole of the evidence Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus is that It was discarded this variant supported... Of Mark ( 16:9-20 ) differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus absent from the Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p... Important decisions that Bible translators must make include: has almost all of the page across from article. Matthew 14:35 Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B between the consensus text and the Dead Sea are... Matthew 9:28c Retrieved2019-11-11, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 77-78 supported by Vetus Latina and some manuscripts... By a series of early Correctors by alpha character B in the 19th century, Vaticanus... Make include:, B. F. and Hort, F. J the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the complete... These distigmai was recognized in 1995 byPhilip Payne of theWestern text-type final example of insignificance, (:!, G. D. ( 1968-9 ) 10:11 the Byzantine Majority text is in closer withCodex! Have that Sinaiticus is designated by siglum, and final is only replaced word! For initial is unknown, and perhaps another 40 that are undetermined you deeper... In the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript B, Matthew 10:16a [ ]... Times instead of, while scribe a normally uses an abbreviated form simplistic that... Are other intriguingly Old works like the Codex Sinaiticus, also called s, the known... Syrsin [ 3 ] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J decisions that Bible must... Difference between the consensus text and the Dead Sea Scrolls are all online these to be found...